Sensititre YeastOne显色药敏板与微量肉汤稀释法检测阿萨希毛孢子菌体外药物敏感性比较研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的以CLSI微量肉汤稀释法为参考方法，探讨商品化显色药敏板（Sensititre YeastOne）检测阿萨希毛孢子菌体外药物敏感性的临床应用价值。方法分别用微量肉汤稀释法和Sensititre YeastOne同时检测62株阿萨希毛孢子菌对临床常用7种抗真菌药物的体外敏感性，MIC值读取时间分别为24 h和48 h。结果微量肉汤稀释法结果显示卡泊芬净和米卡芬净对阿萨希毛孢子菌无体外活性，二者MIC₉₀均为16 μg/mL；唑类药物对阿萨希毛孢子菌体外活性较好，培养24 h MIC₉₀分别为氟康唑8 μg/mL、伏立康唑0.125 μg/mL、伊曲康唑0.5 μg/mL；4.8%（3/62）阿萨希毛孢子菌对两性霉素B有高MIC值（4 μg/mL）；经24 h培养，Sensititre YeastOne与微量肉汤稀释法检测阿萨希毛孢子菌对7种抗真菌药物的体外MIC一致率（essential agreement，EA）分别为氟康唑93.5%，伏立康唑98.4%，伊曲康唑98.4%，两性霉素B 98.4%，5-氟胞嘧啶88.7%，卡泊芬净100%，米卡芬净100%；培养48 h后，二者检测两性霉素B和5-氟胞嘧啶MIC一致率有所下降，分别为83.9%和67.7%；对微量肉汤稀释法而言，培养时间对两性霉素B和5-氟胞嘧啶MIC值影响较大，24 h和48 h MIC一致率分别为69.4%和53.2%，对Sensititre YeastOne，MIC值明显受培养时间影响的药物仅见于5-氟胞嘧啶，24 h和48 h MIC一致率为11.3%，其余药物不同MIC读取时间一致率非常好。结论唑类药物对阿萨希毛孢子菌体外抗菌活性较好，Sensititre YeastOne和微量肉汤稀释法检测阿萨希毛孢子菌体外MIC值一致率较高，用于临床阿萨希毛孢子菌体外药物敏感性检测具有一定的实用价值。

关键词: 阿萨希毛孢子菌, 药敏试验, 微量肉汤稀释法, Sensititre YeastOne

Abstract:

Objective To assess the utility of a commercially prepared,colorimetric microdilution panel (Sensititre YeastOne) for testing T.asahii isolates. Methods A total of 62 T.asahii isolates against seven antifungal agents were detected simultaneously by both Sensititre YeastOne and broth microdilution method.The broth microdilution method was adopted as reference method.MIC endpoints were read after 24 h and 48 h of incubation. Results Susceptibility results by broth microdilution method:caspofungin and micafungin showed no in vitro antifungal activities against T.asahii,both of their MIC₉₀s were 16 μg/mL.Azoles had good antifungal activities against T.asahii isolates,MIC₉₀ were fluconazole (8 μg/mL),voriconazole (0.125 μg/mL) and itraconazole (0.5 μg/mL) at 24 h incubation.Three isolates (4.8%,3/62) of T.asahii had high MICs (4 μg/mL) against amphotericin B.After 24 h incubation,essential agreement (EA) between broth microdilution method and Sensititre YeastOne in seven agents were fluconazole (93.5%),voriconazole (98.4%),itraconazole (98.4%),amphotericin B (98.4%),5-flucytosine (88.7%),caspofungin(100%),micafungin(100%),respectively;EA between the two methods decreased to 83.9% (amphotericin B) and 67.7% (flucytosine) when MICs were determined at 48 h incubation.For broth microdilution method,poor agreement was observed mainly for amphotericin B (69.4%) and flucytosine (53.2%),while for Sensititre YeastOne,the overall EA of 24 h and 48 h MICs were excellent except for flucytosine (11.3%). Conclusions Azoles had good in vitro antifungal activities against T.asahii isolates.The Sensititre YeastOne appeared to be comparable to the CLSI broth microdilution method in testing T.asahii isolates and could be used as an alternative for susceptibility testing of T.asahii isolates in clinical laboratories.

Key words: T.asahii, antifungal susceptibility, broth microdilution, Sensititre YeastOne

中图分类号:

R379.9

郭莉娜, 于淑颖, 王贺, 徐英春. Sensititre YeastOne显色药敏板与微量肉汤稀释法检测阿萨希毛孢子菌体外药物敏感性比较研究[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2017, 12(4): 198-202,220.

GUO Li-na, YU Shu-ying, WANG He, XU Ying-chun. Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric panel with broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Trichosporon asahii isolates[J]. Chinese Journal of Mycology, 2017, 12(4): 198-202,220.

参考文献

[1] Girmenia C,Pagano L,Martino B,et al.Invasive infections caused by Trichosporon species and Geotrichum capitatum in patients with hematological malignancies:a retrospective multicenter study from Italy and review of the literature[J].J Clin Microbiol,2005,43(4):1818-1828.
[2] Suzuki K,Nakase K,Kyo T,et al.Fatal Trichosporon fungemia in patients with hematologic malignancies[J].Eur J Haematol,2010,84(5):441-447.
[3] Yang YL,Liu YW,Chen HT,et al.Genotype analysis based on intergenic spacer 1 sequences of Trichosporon asahii collected in Taiwan[J].Med Mycol,2013,51(8):880-883.
[4] Iturrieta-González IA,Padovan AC,Bizerra FC,et al.Multiple species of Trichosporon produce biofilms highly resistant to triazoles and amphotericin B[J].PLoS One,2014,9(10):e109553.
[5] Kushima H,Tokimatsu I,Ishii H,et al.Antifungal susceptibility and drug-resistant mechanism of Trichosporon[J].Med Mycol J,2015,56(4):J123-J128.
[6] Basu S,Tilak R,Kumar A.Multidrug-resistant Trichosporon:an unusual fungal sepsis in preterm neonates[J].Pathog Glob Health,2015,109(4):202-206.
[7] Sugita T,Nakajima M,Ikeda R,et al.Sequence analysis of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer 1 regions of Trichosporon species[J].J Clin Microbiol,2002,40(5):1826-1830.
[8] Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts;approved standard M27-A3,3rd ed[S].Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute,Wayne,PA,2007.
[9] Pfaller MA,Chaturvedi V,Diekema DJ,et al.Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins anidulafungin,Caspofungin,and micafungin[J].J Clin Microbiol,2008,46(7):2155-2159.
[10] Guo LN,Xiao M,Kong F,et al.Three-locus identification,genotyping,and antifungal susceptibilities of medically important Trichosporon species from China[J].J Clin Microbiol,2011,49(11):3805-3011.
[11] Ruan SY1,Chien JY,Hsueh PR.Invasive trichosporonosis caused by Trichosporon asahii and other unusual Trichosporon species at a medical center in Taiwan[J].Clin Infect Dis,2009,49(1):e11-e17.
[12] 郭莉娜,徐英春,范欣,等.Sensititire YeastOne显色药敏板检测念珠菌属体外药物敏感性临床应用研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2016,26(10):2221-2214.
[13] Alexander BD,Byrne TC,Smith KL,et al.Comparative evaluation of Etest and Sensititre YeastOne Panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A2 Reference Broth Microdilution Method for testing Candida Susceptibility to seven antifungal agents[J].J Clin Microbiol,2007,45(3):698-706.
[14] Espinel-Ingroff A,Pfaller M,Messer SA,et al.Multicenter comparison of the sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory standards M27-A reference method for testing clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp,Cryptococcus spp,and other yeasts and yeast-like organisms[J].J Clin Microbiol,1999,37(3):591-595.

[1]	杨靖娴, 邵冬华, 郭莉娜, 刘静, 徐英春, 梁国威. 北京某医院侵袭性念珠菌感染的菌株分布及药敏分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(6): 359-363,370.
[2]	李颖, 王贺, 张戈, 刘文静, 徐英春. Sensititre YeastOne显色药敏板与微量肉汤稀释法检测曲霉体外抗真菌药物敏感性的一致性研究[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(4): 197-201.
[3]	曲芯瑶, 李珊山, 曲悦, Abdulhakim Salad Nageye, 宋洋, 崔岩. 10种中药单体对球形孢子丝菌的体外抗真菌作用研究[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(3): 145-149.
[4]	张文, 罗莹, 国承杰, 徐英春, 肖盟, 类承斌, 赵燕, 毕蕾. 院内念珠菌血症临床特点及病原菌分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(3): 154-160.
[5]	盛以泉, 许超, 许书杰, 汤滨滨. 2013~2017年我院酵母菌感染分布及耐药分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(3): 164-166.
[6]	阚思玥, 蔡晴, 金云, 陈伟, 胡素泉, 杨连娟, 刘维达. 婴幼儿皮肤黏膜念珠菌病临床特点及其病原菌体外药敏分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(2): 97-100.
[7]	刘玉磊, 刘美清, 王丽, 袁慧, 郭莉娜. 心血管导管相关念珠菌血症菌种分布、药物敏感性及患者预后情况的分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2020, 15(1): 37-42.
[8]	栗方, 李志荣, 赵颖, 赵建宏, 张延海, 董爱英, 刘金禄, 郭彦言, 孙艳, 赵文申, 谢守军, 魏宏莲, 张金艳, 任宏涛, 王建升, 吴相锟, 光晓, 刘冬青, 杜红丽, 郭映辉, 徐英春, 肖盟, 杨文航, 徐晓琳. 河北地区侵袭性酵母样真菌的菌株分布及药敏分析[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2019, 14(4): 222-227.
[9]	徐春晖, 林青松, 宿扬, 吕燕霞, 田志颖, 孙福军, 苏东, 王朝, 王川. 血液病患者合并阿萨希毛孢子菌菌血症3例并文献回顾[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2019, 14(2): 104-106.
[10]	周馨, 马筱玲, 叶书来, 鲁怀伟, 王影. 少见尖端赛多孢子菌致脑组织感染1例及系列研究[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2018, 13(5): 294-296,304.
[11]	万力, 宋志霞, 杨芦蓉, 杨林. 腹膜透析隧道阿萨希毛孢子菌感染1例[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2018, 13(2): 93-94.
[12]	孙伟, 邓娟, 苏建荣. 阿萨希毛孢子菌通过分泌铁载体在低铁限制性条件下生长[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2018, 13(1): 1-3.
[13]	孙伟, 邓娟, 苏建荣. 铜绿假单胞菌脂多糖对阿萨希毛孢子菌生物膜形成的影响[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2017, 12(3): 140-143.
[14]	卢祥婷, 黄欣. 10种中药提取物抗念珠菌体外药敏实验[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2017, 12(2): 83-85.
[15]	王平, 朱壮彦, 贺义恒, 范瑞强. 外阴阴道念珠菌病菌种分布及药敏检测[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2017, 12(2): 106-107.