聚合酶链反应在真菌性水(脓)疱诊断难辨认癣中的应用

中国真菌学杂志　 2022, Vol. 17 　Issue (2): 115-119,128.

聚合酶链反应在真菌性水(脓)疱诊断难辨认癣中的应用

夏慧¹, 杨虹², 张鹏飞², 莫小辉³, 谭飞^1,2

1. 安徽医科大学上海皮肤病临床学院, 上海 200443;
2. 同济大学附属皮肤病医院, 上海 200443;
3. 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院, 上海 200127

收稿日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-04-28 发布日期:2022-05-07
通讯作者: 谭飞,E-mail:tanfeitrue@126.com E-mail:tanfeitrue@126.com
作者简介:夏慧,女(汉族),硕士研究生在读.E-mail:luchuan134400@163.com
基金资助:
上海申康临床研究培育项目（SHDC12018X01）

Application of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tinea incognito with fungal blisters or pustules

XIA Hui¹, YANG Hong², ZHANG Pengfei², MO Xiaohui³, TAN Fei^1,2

1. Clinical College of Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Shanghai 200443, China;
2. Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200443, China;
3. Renji Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China

Received:2021-10-18 Online:2022-04-28 Published:2022-05-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析聚合酶链反应（polymerase chain reaction，PCR）在真菌性水（脓）疱诊断难辨认癣中的临床价值。方法纳入34例2020年7月—2021年10月就诊于我院（上海市皮肤病医院）门诊表现为水（脓）疱难辨认癣的患者，对34例患者的疱液标本进行PCR检测，并通过荧光染色镜检、真菌培养等进行对比。结果共收集34例患者的疱液标本，荧光染色镜检、真菌培养和PCR的敏感性分别为100%、77.8%和100%，特异性分别为87.5%、100%和75%，阳性预测值分别为90%、100%和81.8%，阴性预测值分别为100%、80%和100%，准确度分别为94.1%、88.2%和88.2%。疱液提取DNA、PCR扩增和测序比对在12 h内完成，鉴定出6种22例真菌（1例鉴定到属）。结论在真菌性水（脓）疱诊断难辨认癣中，PCR有较好的敏感性和准确度。PCR相较真菌镜检能判定真菌种类，相较真菌培养能缩短时间，能为难辨认癣的临床快速诊断与及时治疗提供参考价值。

关键词: PCR, 难辨认癣, 疱液, 菌种鉴定

Abstract: Objective To analyze the clinical value of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in fungal blisters or pustules to diagnose tinea incognito. Methods From July 2020 to October 2021, thirty-four patients presenting tinea incognito with blisters or pustules in the outpatient department of our hospital (Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital) were included. PCR was performed in blister or pustule fluid specimens from 34 patients and compared by fluorescent staining microscopy and fungal culture. Results Blister or pustule fluid specimens were collected from a total of 34 patients. For fluorescent staining microscopy, fungal culture and PCR, the sensitivities were 100%, 77.8% and 100%, the specificities were 87.5%, 100% and 75%, the positive predictive values were 85.7%, 100% and 75%, the negative predictive values were 100%, 80% and 100%, the accuracy were 94.1%,88.2% and 88.2%, respectively. DNA extraction from blister or pustule fluid, PCR amplification and sequencing comparisons were completed within 12 hours, which identified six species and 22 cases of fungi (one case was identified to genus). Conclusion In the diagnosis of tinea incognito with fungal blisters or pustules, PCR has good sensitivity and accuracy. PCR can determine the fungal species compared with fluorescent staining microscopy and shorten the time compared to fungal culture, which can provide reference value for rapid clinical diagnosis and timely treatment of tinea incognito.

Key words: PCR, tinea incognito, blister fluid, fungus identification

中图分类号:

R756

夏慧, 杨虹, 张鹏飞, 莫小辉, 谭飞. 聚合酶链反应在真菌性水(脓)疱诊断难辨认癣中的应用[J]. 中国真菌学杂志, 2022, 17(2): 115-119,128.

XIA Hui, YANG Hong, ZHANG Pengfei, MO Xiaohui, TAN Fei. Application of polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tinea incognito with fungal blisters or pustules[J]. Chinese Journal of Mycology, 2022, 17(2): 115-119,128.

参考文献

[1] NENOFF P,KRÜGER C,SCHALLER J,et al.Mycology-an update part 2:dermatomycoses:clinical picture and diagnostics[J].J Dtsch Dermatol Ges,2014,12(9):749-777.
[2] 唐芹芹,刘海霞,徐江媚,等.难辨认癣的临床进展[J].实用皮肤病学杂志,2018,11(3):168-170.
[3] 唐芹芹,陈玉娟,刘海霞,等.难辨认癣临床调查及致病菌鉴定[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2019, 33(4):409-413.
[4] TURRA N,NAVARRETE J,MAGLIANO J,et al.Follicular tinea faciei incognito:the perfect simulator[J].An Bras Dermatol,2019,94(3):372-374.
[5] AMIGO M,MILANI-NEJAD N,MOSSER-GOLDFARB J.Periocular tinea faciei[J].J Pediatr,2020,221:255-256.DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.031.
[6] 徐瑾,何咏,邓列华,等.荧光染色法、双重荧光染色法与KOH湿片法在甲真菌诊断中的比较研究[J].中国真菌学杂志,2020,15(3):167-169.
[7] GUPTA A K,NAKRIEKO K A. Onychomycosis infections:Do polymerase chain reaction and culture reports agree[J]?J Am Podiatr Med Assoc,2017,107(4):280-286.
[8] GRÄSER Y,MONOD M,BOUCHARA J P,et al.New insights in dermatophyte research[J].Med Mycol,2018,56(Suppl 1):2-9.
[9] MERCER D K,STEWART C S.Keratin hydrolysis by dermatophytes[J].Med Mycol,2019,57(1):13-22.
[10] NENOFF P,KRÜGER C,Ginter-Hanselmayer G,et al.Mycology-an update Part 1:Dermatomycoses:causative agents,epidemiology and pathogenesis[J].J Dtsch Dermatol Ges,2014,12(3):188-209.
[11] 中国体癣和股癣诊疗指南工作组.中国体癣和股癣诊疗指南(2018修订版)[J].中国真菌学杂志,2019,14(1):1-3.
[12] 中国手癣和足癣诊疗指南工作组.中国手癣和足癣诊疗指南(基层实践版2020)[J].中国真菌学杂志,2020,15(6):325-330.
[13] 李筱芳,陈辉,崔凡,等.聚合酶链反应快速诊断浅部真菌病[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2005,38(12):722-724.
[14] GUPTA AK,ZAMAN M,SINGH J.Fast and sensitive detection of Trichophyton rubrum DNA from the nail samples of patients with onychomycosis by a double-round polymerase chain reaction-based assay[J].Br J Dermatol,2007,157(4):698-703.
[15] VERRIER J,MONOD M.Diagnosis of dermatophytosis using molecular biology[J].Mycopathologia,2017,182(1-2):193-202.
[16] ARCA E,SARACLI MA,AKAR A,et al.Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of onychomycosis[J].Eur J Dermatol,2004,14(1):52-55.
[17] ALVAREZ-MOSQUERA I,HERNAEZ S,SANCHEZ J,et al.Diagnosis of superficial mycoses by a rapid and effective PCR method from samples of scales, nails and hair[J]. Mycopathologia,2018,183(5):777-783.