欢迎访问《中国真菌学杂志》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

中国真菌学杂志 2019, Vol. 14  Issue (5): 280-283.

论著 上一篇    下一篇

内参标化的肺泡灌洗液GM试验对侵袭性肺曲霉菌病诊断效能的探讨

邱菊, 黄琳, 陈嵌, 夏吉荣   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院检验科, 重庆 400010
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-20 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2019-10-28
  • 通讯作者: 夏吉荣,E-mail:xjr196352@163.com E-mail:xjr196352@163.com
  • 作者简介:邱菊,女(汉族),在读研究生.E-mail:jane_juqiu@163.com

Exploration of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid GM test standardized by internal reference in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

QIU Ju, CHEN Qian, HUANG Lin, XIA Ji-rong   

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010
  • Received:2019-04-20 Online:2019-10-28 Published:2019-10-28

摘要:

目的 探讨肺泡灌洗液(BALF)半乳甘露聚糖检测(GM试验)内标物质的选择及内标化的方法,以及内标化后的BALF GM试验是否能够提高对侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)的临床诊断效能。方法 收集2018年5月至2019年1月重庆医科大学附属第一医院临床拟诊为IPA住院患者的BALF标本156例,同时对曲霉菌抗原、钾离子(K+)、尿素(UREA)、白蛋白(ALB)进行检测,依据组织病理、微生物结果、临床症状及特征、宿主因素等资料将研究对象分为IPA组39例和非IPA组117例,统计分析标化校正和未标化校正的BALF GM试验结果对IPA临床诊断效能的影响。结果 标化校正和未标化校正的BALF GM试验I值在两组间均存在显著性差异(P<0.001),经ROC曲线分析显示非标化BALF GM试验I值的cut-off值为0.69时,曲线下面积为0.731(P<0.001),灵敏度71.8%,特异度70.1%;用K+、UREA、ALB标化BALF GM试验I值后的ROC曲线分析,各cut-off值分别为0.605、1.905、0.69,曲线下面积分别为0.71、0.653、0.701(P值分别为<0.001、0.004、0.002),灵敏度分别为74.4%、66.7%、69.2%,特异度分别为70.9%、63.2%、69.8%。结论 非标化BALF GM试验I值cut-off值为0.69时对IPA的诊断效能最高;用K+标化后的BALF GM试验I值诊断IPA的效能优于非标化的BALF GM试验结果(P<0.001)。

关键词: 侵袭性肺曲霉菌病, GM试验, 肺泡灌洗液, cut-off值, 内参

Abstract:

Objective To to choose and standardizeinternal reference of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan detection(BALF GM test), and to investigatewhether the BALF GM test after standardizing could improve the clinical diagnostic efficiency for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis(IPA). Methods A total of 156 BALF specimens were collected from The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2018 to January 2019. All samples were performed GM test and the levels of potassium, urea and albumin were measured. According to histopathology, microbiological results, clinical symptoms and characteristics, host factors and other data, all patients were divided into two groups:IPA group(39 cases) and non-IPA group(117 cases).The clinical diagnostic efficiencies of standardized and non-standardized BALF GM tests for IPAwere compared. Results The I values of the standardized and non-standardized BALF GM tests were both significantly different between two groups(P<0.001).The ROC curves showed that the cut-off value of the non-standardized BALF GM test was 0.69, the area under the curve was 0.731(P<0.001), the sensitivity was 71.8%, and the specificity was 70.1%. After standardizing by K+, UREA, and ALB, the cut-off values were 0.605, 1.905, 0.69, and the areas under the curve were 0.71, 0.653,0.701, respectively(P<0.001, 0.004, 0.002, respectively).The sensitivities were 74.4%, 66.7%, 69.2%,and the specificities were 70.9%, 63.2%, 69.8%, respectively. Conclusion With the cut-off value of 0.69,the non-standardized BALF GM test hadthe best diagnostic efficiency for IPA. The diagnostic efficiency of the BALF GM test after standardizing by K+ for IPA wasbetter than the non-standardized BALF GM test(P<0.001).

Key words: invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, GM test, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, cut-off value, internal reference

中图分类号: